Packet loss is a common frustration in networking, whether you're troubleshooting WiFi, wired Ethernet, or fibre optic links. Two key scenarios often confuse engineers:
Why do larger ping packets experience more packet loss than smaller ones?
Why might packet loss occur in only one direction on a fibre link?
In this article, we’ll break down both issues, explaining why they happen and how to diagnose them effectively.
📌 Why Larger Ping Packets Have More Packet Loss
When troubleshooting a network, ICMP ping is a go-to tool. But you may notice that small packets go through fine, while larger ones experience higher loss rates.
🔍 1. Fragmentation Issues
If a ping packet exceeds the Maximum Transmission Unit (MTU), it must be fragmented into smaller pieces.
If any fragment is lost, the entire packet is considered lost.
Firewalls or security policies may drop fragmented packets as a security measure.
🔍 2. Buffer Overflows
Network devices (switches, routers, firewalls) have limited buffer space.
Larger packets fill up buffers faster, increasing the chance of dropped packets when congestion occurs.
🔍 3. Higher Chance of Corruption
Larger packets spend more time on the wire, increasing exposure to interference, bad cables, or faulty hardware.
A single bit error causes the entire packet to be discarded.
🔍 4. Hardware Limitations
🔍 5. Wireless-Specific Issues
In WiFi networks, larger packets are more vulnerable to signal interference and retransmissions.
Some wireless setups have a low fragmentation threshold, causing higher loss rates for large packets.
🎯 How to Test Large Packet Loss
You can check this behaviour using ping with different packet sizes:
ping -s 56 8.8.8.8 # Small 64-byte packet (56 + 8-byte ICMP header)
ping -s 1472 8.8.8.8 # Large 1500-byte packet (1472 + 8-byte ICMP header)
If large packets show higher loss, you should investigate MTU mismatches, congestion, or hardware limitations.
📌 Why Packet Loss Can Occur in One Direction on a Fibre Link
🚦 The Nature of Fibre Links
Fibre optic connections use separate strands for transmit and receive signals. This means:
If there’s packet loss in only one direction, it usually means a problem with one of the fibre strands.
🔍 1. A Faulty Fibre Strand Can Affect Only One Direction
If the downlink strand is damaged or dirty, traffic from B → A is impacted, while traffic from A → B works fine.
🔎 Diagnosis:
Use ping or iperf to test in both directions.
Swap the TX and RX fibre pairs. If the problem reverses, one fibre is faulty.
🔍 2. Uneven Optical Power Levels
Fibre optics rely on precise optical signal levels. If the receive power is too weak on one side:
The receiver struggles to interpret the signal, causing packet loss.
The sender might still transmit fine, making the issue appear one-sided.
🔎 Diagnosis:
🔍 3. Unidirectional Congestion or Buffering Issues
Some network devices handle traffic differently in each direction.
A firewall or router might shape traffic more aggressively in one direction.
If one path has a congested buffer, large packets may get dropped only on one side.
🔎 Diagnosis:
✅ How to Troubleshoot These Issues Effectively
Step 1: Check for Large Packet Loss
Use different ping sizes (ping -s 56 vs ping -s 1472).
If large packets are dropping, check MTU settings, buffer limits, or firewall rules.
Step 2: Test Fibre Links in Both Directions
Run ping tests between both IPs (ping -s 56 both ways).
Swap the TX/RX fibre strands to see if the issue reverses.
Use an optical power meter to check signal levels.
Step 3: Identify Hardware or Congestion Issues
Use iperf to test TCP/UDP throughput.
Check for asymmetric routing or firewall shaping rules.
Inspect for buffer overruns or high CPU usage on routers.
🔥 The Rant | Why Network Operators Always Say “No Fault Found”
You ever notice how network operators never find a fault unless their entire core network is on fire? It doesn’t matter how much proof you provide—ping logs, traceroutes, packet captures, live sacrifice to the networking gods—they always claim it’s fine on their side.
Their Favourite Move | Testing from the Core
You report packet loss from your branch site.
Instead of testing from your branch, they test from their core—where, surprise surprise, everything is fine.
They tell you, "Our network is clean. The issue must be on your side."
How This Fails Reality
If a link from your branch to their core is bad, testing from their core does nothing.
It’s like saying your house isn’t on fire because the fire station is fine.
They never test at the problematic point.
Why They Do This?
They Don’t Want to Admit Fault – Because that would mean work.
They Don’t Want SLA Penalties – If they acknowledge an issue, they owe credits.
They’re Too Lazy to Roll a Truck – Dispatching someone costs money.
How to Beat the “No Fault Found” Excuse
✔ Make them test FROM the affected site.
✔ Provide proof – timestamps, bidirectional ping tests, MTR logs.
✔ Escalate and embarrass them – If they refuse to test properly, escalate until someone with a brain gets involved.
🚀Wrap | Don’t Assume Packet Loss is Random
Large packet loss is often caused by MTU mismatches, buffer overflows, or hardware limitations.
Unidirectional packet loss on a fibre link usually means a faulty fibre strand, weak optical signal, or asymmetric traffic shaping.
Network operators will gaslight you into thinking it’s not their problem, so force them to test from the affected location.
By understanding these principles, you’ll troubleshoot packet loss issues more effectively, saving yourself hours of frustration—and maybe, just maybe, making your provider do their job. 🚀
