# 📌 Understanding Packet Loss | Large Pings vs Fibre Uplink/Downlink Issues

Packet loss is a common frustration in networking, whether you're troubleshooting **WiFi, wired Ethernet, or fibre optic links**. Two key scenarios often confuse engineers:

1. **Why do larger ping packets experience more packet loss than smaller ones?**
    
2. **Why might packet loss occur in only one direction on a fibre link?**
    

In this article, we’ll break down **both issues**, explaining why they happen and how to diagnose them effectively.

---

## **📌 Why Larger Ping Packets Have More Packet Loss**

When troubleshooting a network, **ICMP ping** is a go-to tool. But you may notice that small packets go through fine, while larger ones experience **higher loss rates**.

### 🔍 **1\. Fragmentation Issues**

* If a ping packet **exceeds the Maximum Transmission Unit (MTU)**, it must be **fragmented** into smaller pieces.
    
* If **any fragment is lost**, the entire packet is considered lost.
    
* Firewalls or security policies may **drop fragmented packets** as a security measure.
    

### 🔍 **2\. Buffer Overflows**

* Network devices (switches, routers, firewalls) have **limited buffer space**.
    
* Larger packets fill up buffers **faster**, increasing the chance of dropped packets when congestion occurs.
    

### 🔍 **3\. Higher Chance of Corruption**

* Larger packets spend more time **on the wire**, increasing exposure to **interference, bad cables, or faulty hardware**.
    
* A single bit error causes the **entire packet to be discarded**.
    

### 🔍 **4\. Hardware Limitations**

* Some older or overloaded devices **struggle with processing large packets**.
    
* Firewalls and security appliances may **rate-limit large ICMP packets** to prevent DoS attacks.
    

### 🔍 **5\. Wireless-Specific Issues**

* In **WiFi networks**, larger packets are more vulnerable to **signal interference** and retransmissions.
    
* Some wireless setups have a **low fragmentation threshold**, causing higher loss rates for large packets.
    

### 🎯 **How to Test Large Packet Loss**

You can check this behaviour using **ping** with different packet sizes:

```plaintext
ping -s 56 8.8.8.8    # Small 64-byte packet (56 + 8-byte ICMP header)
ping -s 1472 8.8.8.8  # Large 1500-byte packet (1472 + 8-byte ICMP header)
```

If large packets show **higher loss**, you should investigate **MTU mismatches, congestion, or hardware limitations**.

---

## **📌 Why Packet Loss Can Occur in One Direction on a Fibre Link**

### 🚦 **The Nature of Fibre Links**

Fibre optic connections use **separate strands** for transmit and receive signals. This means:

* **One strand handles traffic from A → B (Uplink).**
    
* **The other strand handles traffic from B → A (Downlink).**
    

If there’s packet loss **in only one direction**, it **usually means a problem with one of the fibre strands**.

### 🔍 **1\. A Faulty Fibre Strand Can Affect Only One Direction**

If the **downlink strand is damaged or dirty**, traffic from **B → A** is impacted, while traffic from **A → B** works fine.

🔎 **Diagnosis:**

* Use `ping` or `iperf` to test in both directions.
    
* Swap the TX and RX fibre pairs. If the problem reverses, one fibre is faulty.
    

### 🔍 **2\. Uneven Optical Power Levels**

Fibre optics rely on **precise optical signal levels**. If the **receive power** is too weak on one side:

* The receiver struggles to interpret the signal, causing packet loss.
    
* The sender might still transmit fine, making the issue **appear one-sided**.
    

🔎 **Diagnosis:**

* Use an **optical power meter** to measure the signal at both ends.
    
* Check that the **SFP or transceiver** is correctly seated and clean.
    

### 🔍 **3\. Unidirectional Congestion or Buffering Issues**

Some **network devices handle traffic differently in each direction**.

* A **firewall or router** might shape traffic more aggressively in one direction.
    
* If one path has a congested **buffer**, large packets may get dropped **only on one side**.
    

🔎 **Diagnosis:**

* Use `traceroute` and `mtr` to check for asymmetric routing.
    
* Inspect firewall and QoS settings.
    

---

## **✅ How to Troubleshoot These Issues Effectively**

### **Step 1: Check for Large Packet Loss**

* Use **different ping sizes** (`ping -s 56` vs `ping -s 1472`).
    
* If large packets are dropping, check **MTU settings, buffer limits, or firewall rules**.
    

### **Step 2: Test Fibre Links in Both Directions**

* Run **ping tests** between both IPs (`ping -s 56` both ways).
    
* Swap the **TX/RX fibre strands** to see if the issue reverses.
    
* Use an **optical power meter** to check signal levels.
    

### **Step 3: Identify Hardware or Congestion Issues**

* Use `iperf` to test TCP/UDP throughput.
    
* Check for **asymmetric routing or firewall shaping rules**.
    
* Inspect for **buffer overruns or high CPU usage** on routers.
    

---

## **🔥 The Rant | Why Network Operators Always Say “No Fault Found”**

You ever notice how network operators **never find a fault** unless their entire core network is on fire? It doesn’t matter **how much proof** you provide—ping logs, traceroutes, packet captures, live sacrifice to the networking gods—they **always** claim it’s fine **on their side**.

### **Their Favourite Move | Testing from the Core**

* You report **packet loss** from your branch site.
    
* Instead of testing **from your branch**, they test **from their core**—where, surprise surprise, everything is fine.
    
* They tell you, **"Our network is clean. The issue must be on your side."**
    

### **How This Fails Reality**

* If a link from **your branch to their core is bad**, testing from their core **does nothing**.
    
* It’s like saying your house isn’t on fire because the fire station is fine.
    
* They **never** test at the **problematic point**.
    

### **Why They Do This?**

1. **They Don’t Want to Admit Fault** – Because that would mean work.
    
2. **They Don’t Want SLA Penalties** – If they acknowledge an issue, they owe credits.
    
3. **They’re Too Lazy to Roll a Truck** – Dispatching someone costs money.
    

### **How to Beat the “No Fault Found” Excuse**

✔ **Make them test FROM the affected site.**  
✔ **Provide proof** – timestamps, bidirectional ping tests, MTR logs.  
✔ **Escalate and embarrass them** – If they refuse to test properly, escalate until someone with a brain gets involved.

---

## **🚀Wrap | Don’t Assume Packet Loss is Random**

* **Large packet loss** is often caused by **MTU mismatches, buffer overflows, or hardware limitations**.
    
* **Unidirectional packet loss** on a fibre link usually means **a faulty fibre strand, weak optical signal, or asymmetric traffic shaping**.
    
* **Network operators will gaslight you** into thinking it’s not their problem, so force them to test **from the affected location**.
    

By **understanding these principles**, you’ll troubleshoot **packet loss issues more effectively**, saving yourself **hours of frustration**—and maybe, just maybe, making your provider do their job. 🚀

%[https://bsky.app/profile/mastelek.bsky.social/post/3lqwup5gack27]
