When it comes to selecting an SD-WAN solution, many businesses fall into the trap of relying on extensive feature checklists to make their decision. On paper, this approach might seem logical—compare features across different vendors and select the solution that offers the most. But in practice, this method often leads to overcomplication, unnecessary costs, and an inability to solve the specific business requirements you set out to address in the first place.
The Problem with Feature Checklists
SD-WAN solutions do indeed serve a common need: to provide flexible, secure, and optimized connectivity across different network environments. However, the vast array of available features in modern SD-WAN solutions is often more than what most businesses actually require. Many organizations make the mistake of getting lost in long lists of technical functions without stopping to consider whether these features are even relevant to their needs.
Taking a cut-and-paste approach from marketing collateral and focusing on feature counts might give the illusion of comprehensiveness, but it doesn’t address the core of what truly matters: solving the specific, pressing business challenges that your organization faces.
Features vs. Business Requirements
It's important to remember that business requirements should drive your decision, not feature lists. In many cases, only a small subset of the available SD-WAN features is necessary to meet those requirements. The rest are superfluous, serving only to increase complexity and cost.
A solution with an extensive feature list will likely be more expensive and complicated to manage, while offering no guarantee that it will actually address your business needs. The risk is that you end up with a bloated, expensive system that offers far more than you’ll ever use, without effectively solving the problems you initially wanted to tackle.
For example, a business that needs SD-WAN for high-quality VoIP services might get bogged down evaluating solutions with advanced security features designed for entirely different use cases, such as highly specialized firewall capabilities. While these features may be impressive, they aren’t relevant to ensuring your VoIP calls run smoothly and reliably. In fact, using inappropriate tools for specific tasks—like deploying a Silicon Valley firewall for VoIP—can result in poor performance and wasted expenditure. In other words, you end up paying more for a solution that doesn’t fit the task at hand.
The Real Solution | Tailored Evaluation
A better approach is to evaluate SD-WAN solutions based on how well they can address your specific business requirements, rather than their feature set. This requires an understanding of both the technical and business aspects of your network.
Identify the core problems: Is your network suffering from poor application performance? Do you need better resilience across multiple locations? What are the specific challenges—such as latency or bandwidth fairness—that your network needs to solve?
Focus on the architecture: Some business requirements can only be met by a technical function that is implemented in a specific architecture. For example, if your business demands high resilience across multiple locations, the underlying architecture of the SD-WAN solution matters more than an extensive feature list. In this case, a hub-and-spoke architecture may be more appropriate than a mesh network, depending on your network design.
Avoid unnecessary complexity: The more features a solution has, the more complex it becomes. This can lead to higher operational costs and increased management overhead. Complexity does not equate to effectiveness—especially if those features aren’t aligned with your business goals.
Agnostic Solutions for Real Business Needs
The best SD-WAN solution is one that is agnostic to specific technical service chains and designed to address your most pressing business requirements without adding unnecessary layers of complexity. Instead of focusing on how many bells and whistles a solution has, look at whether it is flexible and scalable enough to meet your evolving business needs.
For example, if your primary concern is maintaining connectivity during network brownouts or optimizing bandwidth usage, then focus on SD-WAN solutions that excel in those areas. Adding layers of security features designed for a completely different purpose (like firewall capabilities meant for high-security environments) may only serve to increase costs without delivering value.
Wrap | Practicality Over Complexity
In the end, choosing an SD-WAN solution should not be about finding the one with the most features but about finding the one that best meets your business needs. A solution that promises everything may end up delivering very little of what your business actually requires.
Focus on practicality and effectiveness. The goal is not to have the most feature-rich SD-WAN but to have the one that solves your specific business problems in the most efficient way possible. By avoiding the trap of feature checklists and concentrating on your core requirements, you can ensure that your SD-WAN investment delivers real value, rather than just impressive-sounding functionality.
A smarter, leaner approach to SD-WAN will not only save you money but also simplify your operations, making it easier to manage your network and ensure that it continues to support your business as it grows.
Ronald Bartels ensures that Internet inhabiting things are connected reliably online at Nepean Networks - the leading specialized SD-WAN provider in South Africa. Learn more about the best SD-WAN in the world: 👉Contact Nepean
