🔥🧱Cybersecurity Revolution: Why Fancy-Pants Firewalls Are Losing Ground to Cloud-Native Defenders 💂

🔥🧱Cybersecurity Revolution: Why Fancy-Pants Firewalls Are Losing Ground to Cloud-Native Defenders 💂

Quo vadis? Fancy pants firewalls are destined to become rusty old locks on the IT scrapheap. Generic Intel Corporation computers using Linux is destined to become ubiquitous

·

3 min read

In the rapidly evolving landscape of cybersecurity, there's a quiet revolution happening, and it's challenging some long-held beliefs. Take a moment to consider the cloud giants like Amazon Web Services (AWS), Google Cloud, Microsoft Azure, Cloudflare, Meta, and others. What's their secret weapon in the battle against cyber threats? Surprisingly, it's not the fancy-pants firewalls we've come to associate with enterprise security. Cisco, Juniper Networks, Checkpoint Systems, Fortinet, WatchGuard Technologies, Sophos, Palo Alto Networks – you name it – they're nowhere to be found. So, the big question arises: Are these cloud behemoths compromising security, or do they possess a different kind of firepower?

The Open-Source Arsenal: Cloud's Best Defense

The truth is, most of these cloud-native solutions rely on an unexpected hero: open-source technology, and more specifically, Linux. At the heart of this Linux-based security approach lies netfilter, the common Linux firewall code, often managed through interfaces like firewalld. And here's the kicker – there's virtually nothing in a fancy-pants firewall that can't be replicated or assimilated by Linux.

In fact, many of those fancy-pants firewalls are essentially decades-old forks of Linux, supposedly "hardened" and "improved" over the years. Some may add a sprinkle of hardware magic called ASICS, but even back in 1993, technologies like Madge Smart token-ring adapters were tapping into similar capabilities. Today, off-the-shelf network adapters, like Intel's network controllers, outperform most firewall ASICs.

The Achilles' Heel of Fancy-Pants Firewalls

The Achilles' heel of these traditional firewalls often lies in their unstructured implementation. Three key factors underscore their vulnerabilities:

  1. Rule Bloat: Instead of logically grouping users or identities, rules are often created haphazardly. This leads to rule bloat, making oversight difficult and compromising optimal firewall management.

  2. Performance Bottlenecks: As the rule count climbs, these firewalls can slow down. Most lack recommended rules deployment practices and mechanisms to improve performance, unlike Linux's IPSET, which offers high-performance traffic decision-making.

  3. Human Error: A common cause of breaches is insecure rule implementation by administrators. Firewall administration demands specialized skills. Misconfigurations, like deploying the ANY/ANY rule, can nullify security and open the door to human error.

Fancy-Pants Firewalls vs. "Next Generation" Steak Knives

But that's not all. Many fancy-pants firewalls are marketed with a set of "next-generation" steak knives. However, the functionalities they offer are far from unique. Linux and cloud-native solutions often provide similar features as standalone options. In essence, these "extras" are merely prolonging the life of an outdated model.

The Cloud-Native Firewall Revolution

As the cloud becomes the standard for businesses worldwide, the dominance of cloud-native firewalls is inevitable. Traditional fancy-pants firewalls, while still relevant, are gradually fading into legacy status. The agility, scalability, and adaptability of cloud-native solutions are positioning them as the future of cybersecurity.

In this dynamic landscape, it's essential to keep pace with the changing tide of cybersecurity. Cloud-native defenders have shown that you don't need fancy pants to protect against modern threats. It's not about the brand of your firewall; it's about how effectively it safeguards your digital assets. The future belongs to those who embrace innovation and adapt to the evolving landscape of cybersecurity.

No alt text provided for this image

Originally published on LinkedIn by Ronald Bartels: